Interbench Results: 2.6.17-ck1 vs. 2.6.17-mm6 vs. 2.6.17-no3 (interactivity)
                    --------------------------------------------------------
This series of tests is for testing the kernels interactivity by simulating multiple different loads,
and determining the latency of each kernel.

Kernels:
-------
(1.) 2.6.17-ck1
(2.) 2.6.17-mm6
(3.) 2.6.17-no3

Audio Simulation:
----------------
(load type)  (best kernel)
No Load:      2.6.17-no3 (3)
Video:        2.6.17-no3 (3)
X:            2.6.17-ck1 (1)
Burn:         2.6.17-ck1 (1)
Write:        2.6.17-ck1 (1)
Read:         2.6.17-ck1 (1)
Compile:      2.6.17-no3 (3)
Memload:      2.6.17-no3 (3)
Winner: 2.6.17-ck1 (X, Burn, Write, Read)
Winner: 2.6.17-no3 (No Load, Video, Compile, Memload)

Overall Winner: 2.6.17-ck1 (1)
Query: Although the results were very close, -ck1 pulled ahead in X, Burn, Write, and Read.
Since X is one of the most stressing activities, we'll give it the gold. 2.6.17-no3 won 4
load types, but since one of them was no load, we won't count that. 2.6.17-mm6 had low enough
latencies, but the max load was much higher in everything.

Video Simulation:
----------------
(load type)  (best kernel)
No Load:      2.6.17-no3 (3)
X:            2.6.17-no3 (3)
Burn:         2.6.17-mm6 (2)
Write:        2.6.17-no3 (3)
Read:         2.6.17-no3 (3)
Compile:      2.6.17-no3 (3)
Memload:      2.6.17-no3 (3)
Winner: 2.6.17-mm6 (Burn)
Winner: 2.6.17-no3 (No load, X, Write, Read, Compile, Memload)

Overall Winner: 2.6.17-no3 (3)
Query: As we've seen above, 2.6.17-ck1 did great in the audio simulation, but the results were so
close and so evenly matched. When we get to a little more stress in the video category, 2.6.17-ck1
seems to get much worse, 2.6.17-mm6 has some improvements over 2.6.17-ck1 here. As you can see in 
the individual result files, the improvements with 2.6.17-no3 were significant in this category.

X Simulation:
------------
(load type)  (best kernel)
No Load:      2.6.17-no3 (3)
Video:        2.6.17-mm6 (2)
Burn:         2.6.17-mm6 (2)
Write:        2.6.17-no3 (3)
Read:         2.6.17-no3 (3)
Compile:      2.6.17-no3 (3)
Memload:      2.6.17-no3 (3)
Winner: 2.6.17-mm6 (Video, Burn)
Winner: 2.6.17-no3 (No Load, Write, Read, Compile, Memload)

Overall Winner: 2.6.17-no3 (3) 
Query: We've seen the necktie over Audio, and the almost blowout in Video, in the X category
things were very close with ALL the kernels. 2.6.17-mm6 took a couple of close wins, and
2.6.17-no3 took the rest of the close wins. 2.6.17-ck1 barely lost in this one, 2.6.17-mm6
in theory did worse than both of them because of how high the latencies were in a couple of those
categories, and in Video Simulation with the X load.

Gaming Simulation:
-----------------
(load type)  (best kernel)
No Load:      2.6.17-ck1 (1)
Video:        2.6.17-ck1 (1)
X:            2.6.17-no3 (3)
Burn:         2.6.17-mm6 (2)
Write:        2.6.17-no3 (3)
Read:         2.6.17-ck1 (1)
Compile:      2.6.17-no3 (3)
Memload:      2.6.17-mm6 (2)
Winner: 2.6.17-ck1 (No Load, Video, Read)
Winner: 2.6.17-mm6 (Burn, Memload)
Winner: 2.6.17-no3 (X, Write, Compile)

Overall Winner: 2.6.17-no3 (3)
Query: Close results here, every kernel did very well here, the desired cpu usage was equal, or close 
to equal for every load. 2.6.17-no3 just happened to win X, Write, and Compile by a hair, considering
X and Compile are probally the hardest loads, it wins.

***********************************
Well, there you have it, no-sources comparing up against other kernels in the terms of interactivity.

Most Interactive Kernel: 2.6.17-no3 (3)
Second Most Interactive kernel: 2.6.17-ck1 (1)
Least Most interactive kernel: 2.6.17-mm6 (2)

Overall, all the kernels had good results. 2.6.17-no3 has huge improvements in the video category, and
smaller improvements in almost every other category. 2.6.17-no3 is definitely the best at handling the
load, handling the load when it doesn't exist, and memory load handling.

2.6.17-ck1: I was pretty surprised at the differences between 2.6.17-no3, considering they are both using
the same cpu scheduler. I was mainly shocked at the video category. 

2.6.17-mm6: Even more surprising, there are tons of good stuff in here bringing the best of ingosched, I 
have never seen ingosched score that high before.

Best Kernels For (Judging from results):
---------------------------------------
Multimedia: 2.6.17-no3
Production: 2.6.17-no3
Gaming: 2.6.17-no3 + 2.6.17-ck1 - Very close with both of them, -no3 pulls off a little better though.